RM1.01 Introduction to Research Methodology

Dr Heidi Haavik, PhD, is the founder of Haavik Research, a chiropractor and a neurophysiologist who has worked in the area of human neurophysiology since the early 2000s. She is a sought-after international speaker about the science of chiropractic care.

48 Classes

+757 enrolled

Not Enrolled

Take this Course

19.00

Class Includes

6 Lessons
6 Quizzes
Class Certificate

Ratings and Reviews

4.2

Avg. Rating

9 Ratings

What's your experience? We'd love to know!

Cate

Posted 4 weeks ago

interesting

introduced new concepts to me

Joaquin Floreani

Posted 5 months ago

Referencing others in your work

It was ok

Máni Freyr Auðunsson

Posted 5 months ago

Good course

Good questions from the material in the course.

Matius Salinas Regelink

Posted 5 months ago

The answer to second question of the second part is wrong

It says that science is a non-systematic approach

Randall Goodwyn

Posted 1 year ago

relationship between philosophy and science

explanations were great and easy to understand

Sulieti Halafihi

Posted 1 year ago

Flows nicely

We can get lost with heavy terminology and whatnot, especially in science; So, Heidi has delivered these lectures nicely in a way that can be understandable, which is a bonus. Awesome to have the quizzes at the end; that way, we can walk away knowing that we learned something from the lecture.

Lara Follmann

Posted 1 year ago

Great classes

A really good and easy to understand introduction to science and research in chiropractic and why it is important.

Nicola

Posted 1 year ago

Simple and Concise

Ideas and information are taught and shared in an understable simple and concise way which through the aid of the quizzes helps one learn effectively the topic covered.

Edgar Mas

Posted 1 year ago

Great teaching, step by step

I liked the step by step approach with quizzes in between. however the quiz about the scientific method is wrong: states that research is a non-systematic approach whereas it is one. The second question has the steps of the scientific method in the wrong order

Show more reviews

What's your experience? We'd love to know!